September 2011 Newsletter • Co-Chairs' Corner
|
Last week, I had the opportunity to listen to Lorraine Castellano,
Postal Co chair for the LIPCC, speak to the LIPCC about the state
of the USPS with respect to the Post Offices’ lack of ability
to facilitate their right for self determination. One of the things
discussed was the lack of the ability of the USPS to determine which
post offices the USPS can request to “close” based upon
proximity and postal volume. So, I took the time to mapquest from
my home how many post offices are available for my family to access.
From my {Adam's} house:
Woodbury USPS 1.39 miles
Cold Spring Harbor USPS 2.41 miles
Melville USPS 2.7 miles
Syosset USPS 3.10 miles
Bethpage USPS 3.4 miles
Huntington Station USPS 3.96 miles
Plainview USPS 4.23 miles
Jericho USPS 4.3 miles
East Norwich USPS 4.3 miles
According to the USPS statistics, there are 2,306 USPS offices nationwide
that are located between 0-2.5 miles from each other, and an additional
4,283 offices that are between 2.5 miles – 5 miles from each
other. We understand that urban locations, like NYC, where the “miles”
are close to each other, and rural areas which are distant from each
other have to be taken into consideration. However, as you can see
from above, there are 9 USPS locations from my home that exist up
to 4.3 miles from my home.
I can understand if I lived in a rural area where there is a large
area between post offices, what the closing of a USPS station would
mean. However we live on Long Island. Does it really make a difference
if I’m in the car driving to a USPS location if I drive 1.39
miles, or 4.3 miles?
Honestly, if we were to run our businesses like the USPS, which is
mandated on the ways in which they have to run their business, does
this make any sense? We, as a country demand certain requirements
from the USPS. However in addition, we also demand that they are accountable
for profitability.
The USPS has taken extraordinary measures to ensure reductions in
costing, including demands and subsequent positive responses from
the labor unions responsible for the movement of mail. There is a
hiring freeze in place, more efficient equipment has been installed,
reductions in the amount of processing facilities, and yet delivery
times are not only asked of it, but required. The USPS has acknowledged
the reduction in mail volume, and they are trying diligently to adjust
to these reductions.
However, is the government just asking too much? How come the USPS
is required to prefund their pension plan at a cost of 5.5 billion
dollars per year, when no other organization as part of the federal
government is asked or demanded to do the same? There is an overpayment
of approximately 6.9 billion dollars that has been acknowledged by
the Federal Government, and yet, there isn’t any mechanism in
place to allow the USPS to take a deduction on monies “owed”
to it.
The bottom line is that there needs to be changes made, and now is
the time for these changes to be made. We can no longer require that
the USPS be accountable and not give them to tools to do so. As mailers,
we are striving to supply our clients with “in home” dates,
which can not be practically made by the USPS based upon their current
structure.
I am asking you, as members of the mailing community to not only understand
the challenges that are before the USPS, but work with us to have
Congress allow them the flexibility for them to succeed. In future
communications, I will outline the proposed changes. Please let your
elected officials know that you support the USPS in their efforts
to allow them to achieve profitability. Honestly, that is the only
way we, as the mailing community, will be able to succeed as a viable
industry.
Thank you in advance for your help, and support. |
We look forward to seeing everyone in the Fall.
Lorraine Castellano,
Postal Co-Chair |
Adam Avrick,
Industry Co-Chair |
|
|